Your AI is already live. Your governance isn’t. We build the policy, control framework, and decision rights your team runs day to day, not a document that sits in a drive.
Your clinical, operational, and administrative teams are adopting AI faster than governance can keep up. Models touch protected health information, influence care decisions, and enter through vendors you didn’t directly select. Leadership wants the productivity gains. Regulators, your board, and your patients want assurance AI is safe, fair, and accountable.
Most healthcare organizations face this with no AI policy, no clear decision rights, and no way to monitor AI risk over time. Questions land in inboxes with no owner: who approves a new clinical AI tool, what data can it use, who’s accountable when a model drifts. Without a governance program, every AI request becomes a one-off negotiation, and the organization carries exposure it can’t see or measure.
Project-based, with a defined start and end. We design governance that fits how your organization already works, then hand it to your team to run.
Acceptable use, data handling, model lifecycle, and accountability.
Who decides what, from intake to retirement, so requests move instead of stalling.
Mapped to ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, HITRUST AI, and HIPAA, with an eye to the EU AI Act and emerging federal and state rules.
So governance keeps working after the engagement ends, not just on the day we hand it off.
Fairness, transparency, and accountability built into the model, not a separate binder.
Most AI governance in healthcare exists as a policy document nobody operates. The gap is between a framework on paper and a control someone runs on a Tuesday.
We build AI governance that can be validated: intake and use-case review, model inventory, risk tiering, and the approval gates that decide what reaches production. Because we also assess and test AI systems, the controls designed are ones we know hold up when someone attacks the model, not just those that look good in an audit.
Clear decision rights speed approvals, because requests have a defined path instead of landing in limbo. Risk monitoring runs in the background rather than gating every request by committee.
Yes. A governance program aligned to ISO/IEC 42001 and HITRUST AI feeds directly into certification readiness. For ISO/IEC 42001, an accredited certification body performs the audit; we prepare you to meet it.
AI Program Advisory decides what to build and whether it’s worth it. This builds the policy, decision rights, and monitoring that runs once you’ve decided to move. Most clients do Advisory first, then this.
Schedule a 30-minute conversation to walk through your current AI footprint and identify where governance closes the biggest gap.
