100% healthcare-focused. Our practitioners have served as HIPAA expert witnesses, including in matters involving the Office for Civil Rights.
Healthcare organizations answer to a stack of regulators and frameworks that rarely coordinate with one another, and that are rarely owned by the same team. HIPAA usually sits with privacy or compliance. NIST and CMMC usually sit with IT or security. OCR enforcement lands wherever the breach does. The 405(d) Health Industry Cybersecurity Practices are one of the recognized security practices OCR must consider under the HITECH Act when weighing fines, audit length, and corrective remedies, but few organizations can say with confidence whether they even qualify.
The result isn’t audit fatigue. It’s blind spots. If you’re the health system, nobody owns the full regulatory picture, so a gap in one framework surfaces only when OCR, a state regulator, or a federal contracting officer finds it first, not before. If you’re the health tech vendor, a customer’s due-diligence questionnaire or a payer’s security review stalls a deal because no one internally can answer, in one sitting, which obligations the organization actually carries and where it stands against each.
This is the domain where we close that gap. Regulatory Compliance puts one team and one operating model behind every regulator you answer to, so “are we exposed anywhere” has an owner and an answer, not five teams each confident in their own corner.
Regulatory compliance in healthcare fails less often from bad controls than from bad ownership. HIPAA plus the framework a partner demands plus the federal contract requirement plus whatever your state legislature passed last session get assessed by different teams, on different schedules, with no one accountable for the sum of it.
Meditology puts one team behind the whole picture. The same safeguards that satisfy the HIPAA Security Rule support your NIST alignment, your 405(d) recognized-practices position, and what OCR expects if enforcement follows, and mapping them once means the evidence you produce for one obligation counts toward the rest, not a separate benefit, a byproduct of someone finally owning the whole thing.
We work only in healthcare, so the interpretation questions (what “reasonable and appropriate” means for an organization your size, how OCR reads a given safeguard) are answered by people who answer them every week.
Bring us every regulator you answer to, HIPAA, OCR, CMMC, NIST, 405(d), any combination. In thirty minutes, you’ll leave with a clear picture of where ownership is fragmented today and where one integrated program closes the gap fastest.
